Anthropic· AI Research & Engineering· San Francisco, CA | New York City, NY | Seattle, WA
Engineering Manager, Inference Routing and Performance
Classified Tasks (22)
Automate 5%Augment 36%Human-Only 59%
Automate (1)
Fully handled by AI agents
Make real-time fleet-wide routing and efficiency decisions for incoming requests
technical
Augment (8)
AI assists, human decides
Build the cluster-level routing and coordination plane for the inference fleet
technical
Design custom load-balancing algorithms for inference workloads
technical
Build quantitative models of system performance
analytical
Reason about cache placement and eviction across thousands of accelerators
technical
Identify and assess second-order effects of proposed optimizations on fleet behavior
analytical
Ship system-level performance improvements that increase fleet throughput and efficiency
technical
Build data-backed cases to peer teams to justify cross-team protocol changes that improve efficiency
communication
Drive system-level performance improvements across the inference fleet
leadership
Human-Only (13)
Requires human judgment
Debug latency spikes that cross kernel, network, and framework boundaries
technical
Collaborate with teams that write kernels and ML framework internals
communication
Make architectural decisions affecting the inference routing system
leadership
Evaluate deeply technical candidates during interviews
leadership
Run the team operationally to ensure deploys are safe
operational
Reduce incident frequency and manage incident response
operational
Coordinate planning with dependent teams so they can plan around the routing system
communication
Decide whether proposed routing algorithm changes are worth the deploy risk using modeled throughput gains and blast-radius analysis
leadership
Prioritize and sequence competing engineering initiatives across a quarter
leadership
Troubleshoot persistent tail-latency regressions by tracing from fleet-level metrics to per-replica behavior and networking root causes
technical
Run post-incident reviews after capacity events and implement process changes to prevent recurrence
operational
Interview candidates who have built large-scale schedulers and decide on their fit for the team
leadership
Own the technical roadmap for cluster-level inference efficiency, including routing decisions, cache strategies, cross-replica coordination, and synchronization protocols
leadership
Job description
About Anthropic Anthropic’s mission is to create reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems. We want AI to be safe and beneficial for our users and for society as a whole. Our team is a quickly growing group of committed researchers, engineers, policy experts, and business leaders working together to build beneficial AI systems. About the role Every request that hits Claude — from claude.ai , the API, our cloud partners, or internal research — passes through a routing decision. Not a generic load balancer round-robin, but a decision that accounts for what's already cached where, which accelerator the request runs best on, and what else is in flight across the fleet. Get it right and you extract meaningfully more throughput from the same hardware. Get it wrong and you burn capacity, miss latency SLOs, or shed load that shouldn't have been shed. The Inference Routing team owns this layer. We build the cluster-level routing and coordination plane for Anthropic's inference fleet — the system that sits between the API surface and the inference engines themselves, making fleet-wide efficiency decisions in real time. As Anthropic moves from "many independent inference replicas" toward "a single warehouse-scale computer running a coordinated program," Dystro is the coordination layer. This is a deeply technical team. The engineers here design custom load-balancing algorithms, build quantitative models of system performance, debug latency spikes that cross kernel, network, and framework boundaries, and reason carefully about cache placement across thousands of accelerators. They work shoulder-to-shoulder with teams that write kernels and ML framework internals. The EM for this team doesn't need to write kernels — but they do need the systems depth to make architectural calls, evaluate deeply technical candidates, and spot when a proposed optimization will have second-order effects on the fleet. You'll inherit a strong team of distributed-systems engineers, and you'll be accountable for two things that pull in different directions: shipping system-level performance improvements that measurably increase fleet throughput and efficiency, and running the team operationally so that deploys are safe, incidents are rare, and the teams who depend on Dystro can plan around you with confidence. The job is holding both. Representative work: Things the Inference Routing EM actually spends time on: Deciding whether a proposed routing algorithm change is worth the deploy risk, given the modeled throughput gain and the blast radius if it regresses Sequencing a quarter where KV-cache offload, a new coordination protocol, and two model launches all compete for the same engineers Working through a persistent tail-latency regression with the team — walking down from fleet-level metrics to per-replica behavior to a root cause in the networking stack Building the case (with numbers) to peer teams for why a cross-team protocol change unlocks the next efficiency win Running the post-incident review after a cache-eviction bug caused a capacity event, and turning it into process changes that stick Interviewing a candidate who has built schedulers at supercomputing scale, and deciding whether they'd be additive to a team that already goes deep What you'll do: Drive system-level performance Own the technical roadmap for cluster-level inference efficiency — routing decisions, cache placement and eviction, cross-replica coordination, and the protocols that keep routing and inference engines in sync Partner wit